Apple has officially filed an appeal against the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), arguing that the legislation’s interoperability requirements could seriously undermine user privacy.
At the heart of Apple’s claim is a warning: being forced to allow wider access to its system could open the floodgates to sensitive data exploitation by third-party companies.
The company is contesting a potential €500 million ($570 million) fine, stating that the EU’s regulation may unintentionally empower data-hungry tech firms-like Meta-to demand access to information Apple believes should remain private. This includes notification contents, Wi-Fi history, and even personal details that Apple says it doesn’t collect itself.
Apple specifically pointed to Meta as the most aggressive in these data requests, suggesting that many of their demands were completely unrelated to Meta’s core products. According to Apple, this isn’t just about competitiveness-it’s about who controls user data, and whether consumer protection is being weaponized in the name of fair markets.
However, critics argue that Apple is being disingenuous. The EU’s DMA is designed to empower consumers and prevent monopolistic gatekeeping, ensuring users can choose the services they want-without being locked into a particular ecosystem. Some say Apple’s stance on “privacy” is just a cover for maintaining its tight grip on the App Store and iOS.
Apple has also accused the EU of ignoring feedback and maintaining radio silence during consultations. But commentators point out that Apple itself is notorious for being unresponsive to regulators, developers, and users alike-until a fine is on the table.
This ongoing tug-of-war isn’t just about one company or regulation. It reflects a larger, increasingly tense battle between global tech giants and regional regulators trying to rein in their influence. Meanwhile, companies like Microsoft are often left out of the spotlight, even as they quietly entrench themselves in every sector, from operating systems to AI infrastructure via Azure.
Whether Apple’s appeal succeeds or not, the case may redefine how much control Big Tech can exert over platforms and data in Europe-and how far regulators are willing to go to enforce openness, even if it comes at the cost of friction with Silicon Valley giants.
6 comments